Extrapolating from Tolkien's passage on trees and the Faith, I expect the Ents would then be the authentic liturgists. Who might the Ents of today be? Certainly Saruman would be the modernist.
I came to the TLM in late summer 2023. Since then, the handful of Paul VI Masses I've attended (funerals, inclement weather prohibiting travel to my TLM) grate on my soul. The more I know , the deeper I proceed into Tradition, the less I can stomach or tolerate the true backwardness and immaturity of the novus ordo. Give me meat food to feed upon. And when discussing matters Liturgical or Faith with family, the deer-in-the-headlights response I get with objections of my "snobbery" are leading me to wonder, truly: what will it take for people to "get it?" When I told a cousin this week that the Mass isn't about us, and it doesn't matter essentially if you aren't "getting anything out of it," she tersely said with an air of resentment, "well I guess I've just been doing it wrong all these years." She might as well have followed with, "...and I don't care, I want the feels." Oddly- or maybe not so oddly- the less I worry about the feels and enter into the prayers of the Usus Antiquior, the more I'm fed; the deeper I feel; the stronger and more right-ordered I become. Repent from the path of Vatican Ii and proceed with our Tradition! Indeed we shall.
That's the wonderful paradox: when you start to forget yourself in the objectivity of the rite, that is when a whole new level of prayer opens up. It's a transition from emotion to a more spiritual plane, even, I would say, into contemplation.
It is that “snobbery” accusation that I don’t know to handle. Admittedly, there is an elitism in the TLM, not that we’re better by any stretch, but there we find an elevated wisdom that’s not available elsewhere. Outside, we became painfully aware of indifference over detail, a casual view about God, and a mediocrity that is no longer tolerable.
The idea that we should not strive for our very best in divine worship - that this would somehow be proud or vain - is the kind of infintely stupid idea that could only be thought up by modern Westerners.
Yes, my take is that although some may have a genuine but misguided yearning for a Church resembling that of the Apostles, I note that in most things, it seems that there is a greater tendency for convenience and comfort for those attending the new liturgy. Its quite inconvenient and comfortable to kneel, wear formal dress, keep quiet, not turn around and chat, to provide homilies that excoriate evil practices, etc.
It does seem however that those yearning for an acorn Church, don't seem to mind holding onto to the all of the material accoutrements of a more mature Church. I wonder how they might square that circle. In light of former President Biden's reception into the abomination of Freemasonary, and his de facto excommunication from the Church - let us pray for him - I expect that the Pope will remain silent on this, or perhaps lay the mother of all acorns and declare that the early Church didn't excommunicate Freemasons - despite the chronological ansurdity - and that it was a later development of a rigid and backward wayward Church, sorely in need of aggiornamento.
Very helpful and thorough article, Dr K. I thank you very much. You know, when I read that new edition of Blessed Catherine Emmerich’s life of Jesus that you reviewed some time ago, I was deeply moved to learn that during the days after the Resurrection and before Our Lord’s ascension, He spent long hours instructing Peter and John about how to conduct the Mass. I was astonished by her descriptions of how the Mass developed then, as it seemed so close to the Mass of the Ages.
Extrapolating from Tolkien's passage on trees and the Faith, I expect the Ents would then be the authentic liturgists. Who might the Ents of today be? Certainly Saruman would be the modernist.
I don't know, but I suppose if Aquinas were here, he'd have to include a new chapter in his treasure "De Ente et Essentia."
I came to the TLM in late summer 2023. Since then, the handful of Paul VI Masses I've attended (funerals, inclement weather prohibiting travel to my TLM) grate on my soul. The more I know , the deeper I proceed into Tradition, the less I can stomach or tolerate the true backwardness and immaturity of the novus ordo. Give me meat food to feed upon. And when discussing matters Liturgical or Faith with family, the deer-in-the-headlights response I get with objections of my "snobbery" are leading me to wonder, truly: what will it take for people to "get it?" When I told a cousin this week that the Mass isn't about us, and it doesn't matter essentially if you aren't "getting anything out of it," she tersely said with an air of resentment, "well I guess I've just been doing it wrong all these years." She might as well have followed with, "...and I don't care, I want the feels." Oddly- or maybe not so oddly- the less I worry about the feels and enter into the prayers of the Usus Antiquior, the more I'm fed; the deeper I feel; the stronger and more right-ordered I become. Repent from the path of Vatican Ii and proceed with our Tradition! Indeed we shall.
That's the wonderful paradox: when you start to forget yourself in the objectivity of the rite, that is when a whole new level of prayer opens up. It's a transition from emotion to a more spiritual plane, even, I would say, into contemplation.
It is that “snobbery” accusation that I don’t know to handle. Admittedly, there is an elitism in the TLM, not that we’re better by any stretch, but there we find an elevated wisdom that’s not available elsewhere. Outside, we became painfully aware of indifference over detail, a casual view about God, and a mediocrity that is no longer tolerable.
Quite so. Emily Finley has a marvelous piece about this, which I highly recommend:
https://efinley.substack.com/p/are-tlm-catholics-elitists
The idea that we should not strive for our very best in divine worship - that this would somehow be proud or vain - is the kind of infintely stupid idea that could only be thought up by modern Westerners.
Yes, my take is that although some may have a genuine but misguided yearning for a Church resembling that of the Apostles, I note that in most things, it seems that there is a greater tendency for convenience and comfort for those attending the new liturgy. Its quite inconvenient and comfortable to kneel, wear formal dress, keep quiet, not turn around and chat, to provide homilies that excoriate evil practices, etc.
It does seem however that those yearning for an acorn Church, don't seem to mind holding onto to the all of the material accoutrements of a more mature Church. I wonder how they might square that circle. In light of former President Biden's reception into the abomination of Freemasonary, and his de facto excommunication from the Church - let us pray for him - I expect that the Pope will remain silent on this, or perhaps lay the mother of all acorns and declare that the early Church didn't excommunicate Freemasons - despite the chronological ansurdity - and that it was a later development of a rigid and backward wayward Church, sorely in need of aggiornamento.
Exactly!
The reformers imitated the supposed simplicity of the early church - but not its radical asceticism!
Or its deadly persecution!
Right - you can bet if the Catholic Church reaffirmed clearly all of its stances on faith and morals, it would be persecuted like the dickens.
Very helpful and thorough article, Dr K. I thank you very much. You know, when I read that new edition of Blessed Catherine Emmerich’s life of Jesus that you reviewed some time ago, I was deeply moved to learn that during the days after the Resurrection and before Our Lord’s ascension, He spent long hours instructing Peter and John about how to conduct the Mass. I was astonished by her descriptions of how the Mass developed then, as it seemed so close to the Mass of the Ages.
A carelessly pruned tree is a tragedy, and careless pruners should not be given shears, saws, or authority to prune trees.
A really thought-provoking discussion.